Showing posts with label vaccine injury. Show all posts
Showing posts with label vaccine injury. Show all posts

Monday, June 12, 2017

12-year-old boy is the latest pawn of the vaccine industry’s propaganda push to get everyone vaccinated


Study after study has shown a clear link between vaccines and autism spectrum disorders (ASDs), yet health authorities repeatedly fail to protect the people. In fact, they keep defending the industry by stating that childhood vaccines do not increase the risk of ASD or other illnesses. How much more evidence do they need before they finally admit to one of the biggest science frauds in human history?
It is no longer a secret that the vaccine industry will do everything in its power to protect its profits and maintain the general belief that we all need to vaccinate our children. They even think it’s normal to exploit kids to defend their cause. In one of their propaganda stunts, they used a 12-year-old boy as a pawn to promote the pro-vaccine agenda.
In case you missed the story, Marco Arturo, a budding 12-year-old “scientist” who lives in northern Mexico with his family, posted a video on Facebook called “Vaccines DO cause autism,” in which he claimed that he managed to gather scientific evidence about vaccines and autism.
He started the clip by claiming that everyone has been lied to by doctors and pharmaceutical companies about the dangers of vaccines. After a lot of research, he claims to have found proof that vaccines do cause autism, despite Big Pharma and Big Medicine claiming otherwise. However, when he opened his folder with the evidence he gathered, all the pages were blank, insinuating that there is zero evidence of an association between vaccine ingredients and autism spectrum disorders (ASD). He then goes on a rant about how vaccines have actually helped save people’s lives.
“So please, vaccinate your children,” was Marco’s final message.
If you haven’t seen the video, be prepared to be shocked. After bribing people in the government and media to spread their lies, the vaccine industry is now also using innocent kids.
Check out Marco’s clip below.

12-year-old boy vaccine hoax uncovered

Using children who are the most vulnerable to vaccine damage to push the vaccine agenda is just criminal. According to The Liberty Beacon, this video is why people who decide to not inject their kids with toxic substances need to keep informing their children and others about vaccine injuries and the real benefits of natural immunity.
Furthermore, The Liberty Beacon noted that there is NO WAY a twelve-year-old came up with this pro-vaccine propaganda video. The video just looks too clean and professional. It has been carefully scripted and filmed using a professional camera, lighting, and video editing software.
Furthermore, it came to the light that Marco was sponsored by Walgreens and shared by Ashton Kutcher’s media company A Plus. Shortly after the video went viral, Walgreens dropped their sponsorship of the video thanks to a campaign by Hear This Well and parents of vaccine injured children. Additionally, Oye News reported that Google, Disney, and other pro-profit, pro-vaccine zealots helped this video go viral.
Since the vaccine industry has no problem exploiting children in their manipulative videos, it is time for anti-vaccine proponents to step up. It’s time to show the world that the majority of vaccines are far more dangerous than the diseases they are supposed to prevent.
“As a person who was nearly killed by the Hepatitis B vaccine this kid angers me but I also feel sorry for him because I know he is being exploited,” said Christopher Wyatt, The Liberty Beacon staff writer and documentary producer.
He calls for action, not against the boy or his video, but against the true villains: The boy’s parents, the pharmaceutical industry, and the PR firm that decided to use a child to promote vaccine safety.
To learn more about toxic vaccine ingredients read the vaccine manufacturers’ product inserts at NaturalNewsReference.com.
Sources:

Sunday, May 21, 2017

Vaccine zealot Paul Offit claims children can be given 10,000 vaccines all at once, with no harm


Fake news, fake science, fake boobs. Doesn’t it feel like we just can’t trust anything anymore? Take, for example, the super-heated vaccine debate that has been raging for a few years now. How are we as parents supposed to know who we should believe? We have wise-looking men in lab coats assuring us that vaccines save millions of lives each year, and that while they carry some risks, these are minimal, and every child should be vaccinated to protect “herd immunity.” On the other side of the spectrum, we have parents of children with neurodevelopment disorders asking us to believe that their children were damaged by vaccines, and the astronomical rise in autism rates in the last few decades that would seem to back them up. How are we supposed to know where to find the truth?
Well, the only way to find the truth is to follow the money. If scientists and doctors have a vested interest in pushing an agenda, how are we supposed to believe anything they say? Only scientists with nothing to gain financially and no conflicts of interest would be worth listening to, right?
Let’s consider this practically by comparing two vaccine studies with opposite findings.
The first study was published in 2002 in the journal Pediatrics, and the lead author was Paul A. Offit, a pediatrician who specializes in infectious diseases, and is an expert on vaccines, immunology and virology. Offit’s study set out to allay parents’ fears that multiple vaccines might overwhelm or weaken their children’s immune systems.
In the study’s summary the authors assured parents, “Current studies do not support the hypothesis that multiple vaccines overwhelm, weaken, or ‘use up’ the immune system. On the contrary, young infants have an enormous capacity to respond to multiple vaccines, as well as to the many other challenges present in the environment.” The authors also asserted that, “[E]ach infant would have the theoretical capacity to respond to about 10 000 vaccines at any one time.” [Emphasis added]
The problem with this argument is that it completely misses the concern over toxic ingredients added to vaccines such as aluminum, mercury, formaldehyde, squalene and other chemicals that pose severe neurological risks. Surely Dr. Offit doesn’t believe a child can be injected with 10,000 doses of aluminum and mercury without any negative side effects… does he?
A visit to Amazon.com reveals that Offit has been the author or co-author of no less than eight books, all of which “prove” why vaccines are a great idea. Then there’s the fact that Offit is the co-creator (and patent holder) of the RotaTeq vaccine which supposedly protects against rotavirus. And what about the hundreds of thousands of dollars in funding that the professor received for 2008’s “Every child by two” program? Professor Offit certainly has a vested interest in insisting that vaccines are safe. [RELATED: Discover the truth at Vaccines.news]
Let’s consider the second study. Published recently in the Journal of Translational Science, this study had Professor Anthony R. Mawson as lead author. Dr. Mawson, too, has an impressive list of credentials, and is the author of over 50 published studies. After assessing the health outcomes and neurodevelopmental diseases of over 660 American children, the research team found that while vaccinated children exhibited slightly better protection against chicken pox and whooping cough, but not other viruses, as they “were significantly more likely to have been diagnosed with other infections, allergies, and other neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD) like autism and ADHD.”
How much more likely? Vaccinated children were 4.2 times more likely to develop autism, at 4.2 times higher risk of an ADHD diagnosis, had 5.2 times the risk of learning disabilities, were 2.9 times more likely to have eczema, and were a shocking 30 times more likely to have allergic rhinitis!
Now, a careful Amazon.com search will reveal that Professor Mawson has written no pro- or anti-vaccine books. He has no vested interest that I could establish in trying to prove that vaccines are harmful. He’s just a highly-respected scientist who did the study and faithfully recorded the results.
So, who do you believe? The guy who’s built a lucrative and multi-faceted career on doggedly insisting that vaccines are safe? Or the respected scientist who has no hidden agenda and is simply reporting his findings?
Find more coverage of biased vaccine-pushing journalists at VaccineHolocaust.org.
Sources include: