A lot of scientists have been scratching their heads over some of the claims of climate change activists. After all, the results that we’d get from following their advice and getting rid of carbon dioxide, for example, completely fly in the face of their stated goal of making the earth greener. How is it that they can espouse something that would actually have the opposite of its intended effect? There really is only one explanation that makes sense: A greener Earth isn’t really what they want.
What makes the tropical rainforest so lush and brimming with life? If you answered “the rain,” you’d be correct, but have you ever thought about where rain comes from? It’s a complex process, but it essentially comes from water that has been evaporated from oceans and then distributed by the wind according to the influence of various pressure systems. It doesn’t take an environmental science degree to know that this evaporation is caused by warm temperatures. Therefore, it stands to reason that when the planet is warmer, it’s going to be inevitably wetter, which means more water will evaporate from the oceans and fall onto Earth to help grow food crops and forests.
You might not have ever visited a third-world country, but you’ve surely seen videos and photos from these places. You’ve probably seen countless people crowded onto dusty paths, trekking hundreds of miles to fill rudimentary jars with what little fresh water they can find, treating it as a precious commodity they are willing to fight and die for. A desert is an inhospitable place, yet those who deride global warming would end up with more of it if they got their way. In fact, in the 1970s and 1980s, there was widespread concern about the negative effects of global cooling!
What are they really trying to accomplish?
Everything these climate change activists advocate – getting rid of carbon dioxide, reversing global warming entirely – would actually achieve global food scarcity and lead to mass human poverty. There’s no way that smart and educated people don’t know this is what would happen, so why are they pushing for it anyway? It is starting to look more and more like depopulation is their ultimate goal.
The signs are everywhere, from their insistence that everyone is injected with toxic vaccines to their shameless assertions that cancer-causing GMO foods are the best options out there. They view people as the cause of global warming, which they consider problematic, and in their twisted minds, depopulating the planet is the best solution.
As Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, points out, liberal globalists like Ted Turner and Bill Gates have never been shy about expressing their desire to reduce the population, and this narrative is a key part of their agenda.
Adams explores this topic in a powerful video on Health Ranger Science called Re-Greening the Planet With Global Warming and Carbon Dioxide.
This illuminating video comes on the heels of another Health Ranger science video, Carbon Dioxide: The Miracle Molecule of Life. In this insightful video, Adams makes a convincing case for why the Earth needs more carbon dioxide and not less of it. CO2 is not a pollutant that we need to get rid of entirely as the planet would be nearly devoid of life, and clips of barren cities affected by mass die-offs following the elimination of all carbon dioxide help drive the point home.
One thing is clear: If we let the global warming alarmists get their way, we will he headed down a path toward global food scarcity, mass poverty and depopulation.
Sources:
No comments:
Post a Comment