The REAL goal of climate change alarmism is to achieve global food scarcity, mass human poverty and depopulation

A lot of scientists have been scratching their heads over some of the claims of climate change activists. After all, the results that we’d get from following their advice and getting rid of carbon dioxide, for example, completely fly in the face of their stated goal of making the earth greener. How is it that they can espouse something that would actually have the opposite of its intended effect? There really is only one explanation that makes sense: A greener Earth isn’t really what they want.

What makes the tropical rainforest so lush and brimming with life? If you answered “the rain,” you’d be correct, but have you ever thought about where rain comes from? It’s a complex process, but it essentially comes from water that has been evaporated from oceans and then distributed by the wind according to the influence of various pressure systems. It doesn’t take an environmental science degree to know that this evaporation is caused by warm temperatures. Therefore, it stands to reason that when the planet is warmer, it’s going to be inevitably wetter, which means more water will evaporate from the oceans and fall onto Earth to help grow food crops and forests.

You might not have ever visited a third-world country, but you’ve surely seen videos and photos from these places. You’ve probably seen countless people crowded onto dusty paths, trekking hundreds of miles to fill rudimentary jars with what little fresh water they can find, treating it as a precious commodity they are willing to fight and die for. A desert is an inhospitable place, yet those who deride global warming would end up with more of it if they got their way. In fact, in the 1970s and 1980s, there was widespread concern about the negative effects of global cooling!

What are they really trying to accomplish?

Everything these climate change activists advocate – getting rid of carbon dioxide, reversing global warming entirely – would actually achieve global food scarcity and lead to mass human poverty. There’s no way that smart and educated people don’t know this is what would happen, so why are they pushing for it anyway? It is starting to look more and more like depopulation is their ultimate goal.

The signs are everywhere, from their insistence that everyone is injected with toxic vaccines to their shameless assertions that cancer-causing GMO foods are the best options out there. They view people as the cause of global warming, which they consider problematic, and in their twisted minds, depopulating the planet is the best solution.

As Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, points out, liberal globalists like Ted Turner and Bill Gates have never been shy about expressing their desire to reduce the population, and this narrative is a key part of their agenda.

Adams explores this topic in a powerful video on Health Ranger Science called Re-Greening the Planet With Global Warming and Carbon Dioxide.

This illuminating video comes on the heels of another Health Ranger science video, Carbon Dioxide: The Miracle Molecule of Life. In this insightful video, Adams makes a convincing case for why the Earth needs more carbon dioxide and not less of it. CO2 is not a pollutant that we need to get rid of entirely as the planet would be nearly devoid of life, and clips of barren cities affected by mass die-offs following the elimination of all carbon dioxide help drive the point home.

One thing is clear: If we let the global warming alarmists get their way, we will he headed down a path toward global food scarcity, mass poverty and depopulation.

Sources:

NaturalNews.com

NaturalNews.com

Population control? Maine wants to issue a yearly supply of dangerous birth control to women

Birth control has been a topic of immense debate in recent years, and Maine has taken the controversy to a new level with a recent bill regarding the popular medication. One of the aims of the new legislation is to allow women to pick up an entire year’s worth of birth control at once. Currently, insurers from the northeastern state only allow women to receive up to a three month’s supply at once — and in some instances, women are required to go pick up their medication each month. In other words, current laws about birth control in Maine are essentially the same as laws regarding other medications, but this could change under the new legislation.

Insurance companies say that the new bill could also prove to be very costly. According to the Maine Health Association, the bill would also require insurers to cover all approved forms of birth control at no cost to the recipient. Bangor Daily News reports that “Supporters of the bill say its purpose is to remove the barrier between women and consistent contraception.” Some might argue that as it stands, birth control is treated exactly the same as other medications — and that this new legislation would be a form of “special treatment” being assigned based on gender.

What about everyone else who takes prescription medications? Take for example, diabetics: Should they be given a year’s supply of insulin so they can “remove the barriers” to consistent blood sugar control? Reports show that many patients with diabetes cannot afford the costly drug that they need to stay alive. Without prescription coverage, these drugs can cost up to $400. Conversely, one can purchase birth control for less than $10 at many popular retailers, such as Wal-Mart or Target — even without insurance coverage.

Of course, the intention behind this endeavor is not as innocent as its proponents proclaim. One of the perks of birth control that very few people talk about these days is population control. Those little pills women are encouraged to pop every day are very clearly part of the depopulation agenda. Several popular news sources have even authored articles on it: BBC, NPR, The New York Times, and Scientific American are just a few places you can read all about the hidden agenda that lies behind the push for more oral contraception.

Despite the mainstream media’s cries about birth control being a “women’s rights issue,” the sad truth is that it’s really not about that at all. Birth control is being pushed en masse not for the sake of women, but for the sake of the globalists’ crude depopulation agenda. And they’ve got women lining up in droves to fall in accordance with their desires. Willing participants certainly make things easier, now don’t they? By perpetuating the belief that birth control is solely an issue of women’s rights, depopulation proponents are able to ensure their goals are met without having to use force (which would most likely not be so readily accepted).

In addition to masquerading birth control as being just an issue of women’s rights, the risks associated with oral contraceptives has been dramatically downplayed. The FDA has outlined a myriad of side effects and risks that are posed by birth control. These include increased risk of breast cancer, increased risk of blood clots, heart attacks and strokes, headaches or migraines, liver and gallbladder problems, increased blood pressure, weight gain and changes in mood — including depression and anxiety.

Some studies have shown that birth control can raise the risk of depression by up to 80 percent in some cases. And in 2011, a report by the FDA showed that some forms of the medication could raise the risk of blood clots — which can be fatal — by up to 150 percent. Did your doctor outline how high these risks really are when your birth control was prescribed?

Sources:

BangorDailyNews.com

NaturalNews.com

NaturalNews.com