175 U.S. patents prove that geoengineering and weather control technologies are REAL… see the list here

The United States government has granted patent approval to at least 175 inventions and technologies that are officially recognized to control or augment weather systems. (See the full list below.)

For years, Dane Wigington, the founder of GeoengineeringWatch.com, has been mocked by the fake news media for daring to claim that weather control technology exists. Now, with two back-to-back superstorms targeting the United States of America in less than two weeks — Hurricane Harvey and Hurricane Irma — more and more people are beginning to ask whether these storms are being influenced, augmented or even “steered” into their intended targets through the use of exotic technologies.

The idea seems outlandish at first glance. But then you might remember that Al Gore and the global warming crowd openly claim that humans influence the weather all the time, creating hurricanes, tornadoes, floods and droughts as a direct result of human activity. This view is openly endorsed by nearly the entire scientific community, including government agencies like the EPA, which claims that humans are directly altering the atmosphere, weather and ocean levels. Thus, even “official” science organizations openly support the notion that severe weather events are created by people. It is the foundational narrative underpinning global warming and climate change.

The U.S. government confirms that hundreds of technologies exist to control and influence powerful weather systems

Accordingly, anyone who says weather can’t be influenced by humans must simultaneously reject the entire narrative of global warming and climate change, because they are based on essentially the same idea: That large-scale weather events can be directly influenced by human activity. In fact, according to Al Gore and the climate change alarmists, humans have so much control over the weather that today’s scientists can accurately predict sea level rises a full century into the future, even when those same scientists can’t accurately predict the track of a hurricane four days in advance. (Ponder all this for a moment…)

Logically, all those media publishers calling Dane Wigington a conspiracy theorist for promoting the idea of large-scale weather control (geoengineering) must also label Al Gore a conspiracy theorist, too. But Gore’s conspiracies are even larger, as he claims humans can raise the oceans and drastically alter the atmosphere without even trying. (Christians are routinely mocked for believing that Moses could part the oceans, by the way, yet Al Gore says humans can raise all the oceans worldwide without even trying!) Al Gore won a Nobel Peace Prize for saying humans can alter the weather and radically influence hurricanes, tornadoes, droughts and floods. Where is the prize for Dane Wigington’s effort to explain how such feats might be accomplished on purpose? (Oh wait, he isn’t part of the political elite, so his theories are mocked and discredited.)

As you’re attempting to unravel all the contradictions found in global warming narrative, consider these 175 patents that describe — in tremendous detail — highly advanced weather control technology. These patents describe known processes for generating rain, augmenting hurricanes, seeding storm systems, accomplishing weather modification and much more. Keep in mind that all these patents have already been approved by the U.S. patent office, meaning that the U.S. government affirms the scientific feasibility of these inventions.

This full list is cited from GeoengineeringWatch.com:

• 0462795 – July 16, 1891 – Method Of Producing Rain-Fall

• 1103490 – August 6, 1913 – Rain-Maker

• 1225521 – September 4, 1915 – Protecting From Poisonous Gas In Warfare

• 1338343 – April 27, 1920 – Process And Apparatus For The Production of Intense Artificial Clouds, Fogs, or Mists

• 1619183 – March 1, 1927 – Process of Producing Smoke Clouds From Moving Aircraft

• 1665267 – April 10, 1928 – Process of Producing Artificial Fogs

• 1892132 – December 27, 1932 – Atomizing Attachment For Airplane Engine Exhausts

• 1928963 – October 3, 1933 – Electrical System And Method

• 1957075 – May 1, 1934 – Airplane Spray Equipment

• 2097581 – November 2, 1937 – Electric Stream Generator – Referenced in 3990987

• 2409201 – October 15, 1946 – Smoke Producing Mixture

• 2476171 – July 18, 1945 – Smoke Screen Generator

• 2480967 – September 6, 1949 – Aerial Discharge Device

• 2550324 – April 24, 1951 – Process For Controlling Weather

• 2582678 – June 15, 1952 – Material Disseminating Apparatus For Airplanes

• 2614083 – October 14, 1952 – Metal Chloride Screening Smoke Mixture

• 2633455 – March 31, 1953 – Smoke Generator

• 2688069 – August 31, 1954 – Steam Generator – Referenced in 3990987

• 2721495 – October 25, 1955 – Method And Apparatus For Detecting Minute Crystal Forming Particles Suspended in a Gaseous Atmosphere

• 2730402 – January 10, 1956 – Controllable Dispersal Device

• 2801322 – July 30, 1957 – Decomposition Chamber for Monopropellant Fuel – Referenced in 3990987

• 2881335 – April 7, 1959 – Generation of Electrical Fields

• 2908442 – October 13, 1959 – Method For Dispersing Natural Atmospheric Fogs And Clouds

• 2986360 – May 30, 1962 – Aerial Insecticide Dusting Device

• 2963975 – December 13, 1960 – Cloud Seeding Carbon Dioxide Bullet

• 3126155 – March 24, 1964 – Silver Iodide Cloud Seeding Generator

• 3127107 – March 31, 1964 – Generation of Ice-Nucleating Crystals

• 3131131 – April 28, 1964 – Electrostatic Mixing in Microbial Conversions

• 3174150 – March 16, 1965 – Self-Focusing Antenna System

• 3234357 – February 8, 1966 – Electrically Heated Smoke Producing Device

• 3274035 – September 20, 1966 – Metallic Composition For Production of Hydroscopic Smoke

• 3300721 – January 24, 1967 – Means For Communication Through a Layer of Ionized Gases

• 3313487 – April 11, 1967 – Cloud Seeding Apparatus

• 3338476 – August 29, 1967 – Heating Device For Use With Aerosol Containers

• 3410489 – November 12, 1968 – Automatically Adjustable Airfoil Spray System With Pump

• 3429507 – February 25, 1969 – Rainmaker

• 3432208 – November 7, 1967 – Fluidized Particle Dispenser

• 3441214 – April 29, 1969 – Method And Apparatus For Seeding Clouds

• 3445844 – May 20, 1969 – Trapped Electromagnetic Radiation Communications System

• 3456880 – July 22, 1969 – Method Of Producing Precipitation From The Atmosphere

• 3518670 June 30, 1970 – Artificial Ion Cloud

• 3534906 – October 20, 1970 – Control of Atmospheric Particles

• 3545677 – December 8, 1970 – Method of Cloud Seeding

• 3564253 – February 16, 1971 – System And Method For Irradiation Of Planet Surface Areas

• 3587966 – June 28, 1971 – Freezing Nucleation

• 3601312 – August 24, 1971 – Methods of Increasing The Likelihood oF Precipitation By The Artificial Introduction Of Sea Water Vapor Into The Atmosphere Winward Of An Air Lift Region

• 3608810 – September 28, 1971 – Methods of Treating Atmospheric Conditions

• 3608820– September 20, 1971 – Treatment of Atmospheric Conditions by Intermittent Dispensing of Materials Therein

• 3613992 – October 19, 1971 – Weather Modification Method

• 3630950 – December 28, 1971 – Combustible Compositions For Generating Aerosols, Particularly Suitable For Cloud Modification And Weather Control And Aerosolization Process

• USRE29142 – May 22, 1973 – Combustible compositions for generating aerosols, particularly suitable for cloud modification and weather control and aerosolization process

• 3659785 – December 8, 1971 – Weather Modification Utilizing Microencapsulated Material

• 3666176 – March 3, 1972 – Solar Temperature Inversion Device

• 3677840 – July 18, 1972 – Pyrotechnics Comprising Oxide of Silver For Weather Modification Use

• 3722183 – March 27, 1973 – Device For Clearing Impurities From The Atmosphere

• 3769107 – October 30, 1973 – Pyrotechnic Composition For Generating Lead Based Smoke

• 3784099 – January 8, 1974 – Air Pollution Control Method

• 3785557 – January 15, 1974 – Cloud Seeding System

• 3795626 – March 5, 1974 – Weather Modification Process

• 3808595 – April 30, 1974 – Chaff Dispensing System

• 3813875 – June 4, 1974 – Rocket Having Barium Release System to Create Ion Clouds In The Upper Atmosphere

• 3835059 – September 10, 1974 – Methods of Generating Ice Nuclei Smoke Particles For Weather Modification And Apparatus Therefore

• 3835293 – September 10, 1974 – Electrical Heating Apparatus For Generating Super Heated Vapors

• 3877642 – April 15, 1975 – Freezing Nucleant

• 3882393 – May 6, 1975 – Communications System Utilizing Modulation of The Characteristic Polarization of The Ionosphere

• 3896993 – July 29, 1975 – Process For Local Modification of Fog And Clouds For Triggering Their Precipitation And For Hindering The Development of Hail Producing Clouds

• 3899129 – August 12, 1975 – Apparatus for generating ice nuclei smoke particles for weather modification

• 3899144 – August 12, 1975 – Powder contrail generation

• 3940059 – February 24, 1976 – Method For Fog Dispersion

• 3940060 – February 24, 1976 – Vortex Ring Generator

• 3990987 – November 9, 1976 – Smoke generator

• 3992628 – November 16, 1976 – Countermeasure system for laser radiation

• 3994437 – November 30, 1976 – Broadcast dissemination of trace quantities of biologically active chemicals

• 4042196 – August 16, 1977 – Method and apparatus for triggering a substantial change in earth characteristics and measuring earth changes

• RE29,142 – February 22, 1977 – Combustible compositions for generating aerosols, particularly suitable for cloud modification and weather control and aerosolization process

• 4035726 – July 12, 1977 – Method of controlling and/or improving high-latitude and other communications or radio wave surveillance systems by partial control of radio wave et al

• 4096005 – June 20, 1978 – Pyrotechnic Cloud Seeding Composition

• 4129252 – December 12, 1978 – Method and apparatus for production of seeding materials

• 4141274 – February 27, 1979 – Weather modification automatic cartridge dispenser

• 4167008 – September 4, 1979 – Fluid bed chaff dispenser

• 4347284 – August 31, 1982 – White cover sheet material capable of reflecting ultraviolet rays

• 4362271 – December 7, 1982 – Procedure for the artificial modification of atmospheric precipitation as well as compounds with a dimethyl sulfoxide base for use in carrying out said procedure

• 4402480 – September 6, 1983 – Atmosphere modification satellite

• 4412654 – November 1, 1983 – Laminar microjet atomizer and method of aerial spraying of liquids

• 4415265 – November 15, 1983 – Method and apparatus for aerosol particle absorption spectroscopy

• 4470544 – September 11, 1984 – Method of and Means for weather modification

• 4475927 – October 9, 1984 – Bipolar Fog Abatement System

• 4600147 – July 15, 1986 – Liquid propane generator for cloud seeding apparatus

• 4633714 – January 6, 1987 – Aerosol particle charge and size analyzer

• 4643355 – February 17, 1987 – Method and apparatus for modification of climatic conditions

• 4653690 – March 31, 1987 – Method of producing cumulus clouds

• 4684063 – August 4, 1987 – Particulates generation and removal

• 4686605 – August 11, 1987 – HAARP Patent / EASTLUND PATENT – Method and apparatus for altering a region in the earth’s atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere

• 4704942 – November 10, 1987 – Charged Aerosol

• 4712155 – December 8, 1987 – Method and apparatus for creating an artificial electron cyclotron heating region of plasma

• 4744919 – May 17, 1988 – Method of dispersing particulate aerosol tracer

• 4766725 – August 30, 1988 – Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor

• 4829838 – May 16, 1989 – Method and apparatus for the measurement of the size of particles entrained in a gas

• 4836086 – June 6, 1989 – Apparatus and method for the mixing and diffusion of warm and cold air for dissolving fog

• 4873928 – October 17, 1989 – Nuclear-sized explosions without radiation

• 4948257 – August 14, 1990 – Laser optical measuring device and method for stabilizing fringe pattern spacing

• 1338343– August 14, 1990 – Process and Apparatus for the production of intense artificial Fog

• 4999637 – March 12, 1991 – Creation of artificial ionization clouds above the earth

• 5003186 – March 26, 1991 – Stratospheric Welsbach seeding for reduction of global warming

• 5005355 – April 9, 1991 – Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor

• 5038664 – August 13, 1991 – Method for producing a shell of relativistic particles at an altitude above the earths surface

• 5041760 – August 20, 1991 – Method and apparatus for generating and utilizing a compound plasma configuration

• 5041834 – August 20, 1991 – Artificial ionospheric mirror composed of a plasma layer which can be tilted

• 5056357 – October 15, 1991- Acoustic method for measuring properties of a mobile medium

• 5059909 – October 22, 1991 – Determination of particle size and electrical charge

• 5104069 – April 14, 1992 – Apparatus and method for ejecting matter from an aircraft

• 5110502 – May 5, 1992 – Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor

• 5156802 – October 20, 1992 – Inspection of fuel particles with acoustics

• 5174498 – December 29, 1992 – Cloud Seeding

• 5148173 – September 15, 1992 – Millimeter wave screening cloud and method

• 5242820 – September 7, 1993 – Army Mycoplasma Patent Patent

• 5245290 – September 14, 1993 – Device for determining the size and charge of colloidal particles by measuring electroacoustic effect

• 5286979 – February 15, 1994 – Process for absorbing ultraviolet radiation using dispersed melanin

• 5296910 – March 22, 1994 – Method and apparatus for particle analysis

• 5327222 – July 5, 1994 – Displacement information detecting apparatus

• 5357865 – October 25, 1994 – Method of cloud seeding

• 5360162 – November 1, 1994 – Method and composition for precipitation of atmospheric water

• 5383024 – January 17, 1995 – Optical wet steam monitor

• 5425413 – June 20, 1995 – Method to hinder the formation and to break-up overhead atmospheric inversions, enhance ground level air circulation and improve urban air quality

• 5434667 – July 18, 1995 – Characterization of particles by modulated dynamic light scattering

• 5441200 – August 15, 1995 – Tropical cyclone disruption

• 5486900 – January 23, 1996 – Measuring device for amount of charge of toner and image forming apparatus having the measuring device

• 5556029 – September 17, 1996 – Method of hydrometeor dissipation (clouds)

• 5628455 – May 13, 1997 – Method and apparatus for modification of supercooled fog

• 5631414 – May 20, 1997 – Method and device for remote diagnostics of ocean-atmosphere system state

• 5639441 – June 17, 1997 – Methods for fine particle formation

• 5762298 – June 9, 1998 – Use of artificial satellites in earth orbits adaptively to modify the effect that solar radiation would otherwise have on earth’s weather

• 5800481 – September 1, 1998 – Thermal excitation of sensory resonances

• 5912396 – June 15, 1999 – System and method for remediation of selected atmospheric conditions

• 5922976 – July 13, 1999 – Method of measuring aerosol particles using automated mobility-classified aerosol detector

• 5949001 – September 7, 1999 – Method for aerodynamic particle size analysis

• 5984239 – November 16, 1999 – Weather modification by artificial satellite

• 6025402 – February 15, 2000 – Chemical composition for effectuating a reduction of visibility obscuration, and a detoxifixation of fumes and chemical fogs in spaces of fire origin

• 6030506 – February 29, 2000 – Preparation of independently generated highly reactive chemical species

• 6034073 – March 7, 2000 – Solvent detergent emulsions having antiviral activity

• 6045089 – April 4, 2000 – Solar-powered airplane

• 6056203 – May 2, 2000 – Method and apparatus for modifying supercooled clouds

• 6110590 – August 29, 2000 – Synthetically spun silk nanofibers and a process for making the same

• 6263744 – July 24, 2001 – Automated mobility-classified-aerosol detector

• 6281972 – August 28, 2001 – Method and apparatus for measuring particle-size distribution

• 6315213 – November 13, 2001 – Method of modifying weather

• 6382526 – May 7, 2002 – Process and apparatus for the production of nanofibers

• 6408704 – June 25, 2002 – Aerodynamic particle size analysis method and apparatus

• 6412416 – July 2, 2002 – Propellant-based aerosol generation devices and method

• 6520425 – February 18, 2003 – Process and apparatus for the production of nanofibers

• 6539812 – April 1, 2003 – System for measuring the flow-rate of a gas by means of ultrasound

• 6553849 – April 29, 2003 – Electrodynamic particle size analyzer

• 6569393 – May 27, 2003 – Method And Device For Cleaning The Atmosphere

• 0056705 A1 – March 17, 2005 – Weather Modification by Royal Rainmaking Technology

• 6890497 – May 10, 2005 – Method For Extracting And Sequestering Carbon Dioxide

• 7965488 – November 9, 2007 – Methods Of Removing Aerosols From The Atmosphere

• 8048309 –  August 28, 2008 – Seawater-Based Carbon Dioxide Disposal

• 8012453 – October 27, 2008 – Carbon Sequestration And Production Of Hydrogen And Hydride

• 7645326 – January 12, 2010 – RFID environmental manipulation

• 7655193 – February 2, 2010 – Apparatus For Extracting And Sequestering Carbon Dioxide

• 8079545 – December 20, 2011 – Ground based Manipulation and Control of Aerial Vehicle during nonflying operations

• 0117003 – October 5, 2012 – Geoengineering Method Of Business Using Carbon Counterbalance Credits – alternate link

• 8373962 – February 12, 2013 – Charged seed cloud as a method for increasing particle collisions and for scavenging airborne biological agents and other contaminants

California may legalize “liquid cremation” in bizarre attempt to fight global warming

 It’s no secret that human activity can contribute a great deal to damaging the environment, but did you know that you are hurting our planet even in death? The current methods of cremation that are offered in California are not environmentally friendly enough for some people’s tastes, and the state senate is now mulling legalizing liquid cremation.

Cremation is believed by some to be more environmentally friendly than burial, given the formaldehyde and other chemicals used in embalming bodies and the fact that large caskets – typically made of wood– are being buried in the ground and taking up a lot of precious land. Nevertheless, cremation causes mercury to be released into the air and it uses a lot of natural gas.

Enter liquid cremation, which is sometimes referred to as flameless cremation, water cremation, or bio-cremation. In this process, the dead body is dissolved using a hot chemical bath that leaves behind a sterile solution that is washed down the drain. This process has just a quarter of the carbon footprint of a traditional cremation by fire and just a sixth of that of burial.

This is the third time California has considering legalizing the unconventional approach. Two past efforts failed despite the process being legal in 14 other states.

Water cremation process is not an acid bath

Right now, there is one place in the state where bodies are legally dissolved: a UCLA lab that disposes of cadavers that the medical school no longer needs. According to the head of the school’s Donated Body Program, Dean Fisher, the process does not use acid; instead, a chemical called potassium hydroxide is used to catalyze the hydrogen in water so it attacks the chemical bonds between the body’s molecules faster in a process known as alkaline hydrolysis.

In fact, Fisher points out that potassium hydroxide exists in the crust of the Earth and helps break down organic matter in dirt. He says it’s like speeding up the process of burying a body in soil with the help of heat. The process is simple: the body is placed inside a stainless steel chamber that is roughly the size of a van and is not unlike a large pressure cooker. Inside, the cadavers are heated to a temperature of 302 degrees and then are bathed in 270 gallons of the dissolving liquid for three or four hours.

The process uses less water than the average American household does in one day, and unlike a traditional cremation, it doesn’t release any greenhouse gases. To get an idea of just how much energy a fire cremation uses, the BBC reports that the heat used to cremate a body the conventional way could heat an entire home for a full week in winter.

After the process, the tray is removed from the chamber, where the bones are left behind along with any medical hardware the person might have had, like prosthetics and pacemakers. Nothing organic survives; not even a trace of DNA can be found. Some of the metal from the parts is recycled, and this is one of the process’s biggest strengths over fire cremation; toxic mercury from dental fillings vaporizes when bodies are burned and is released into the air.

The remaining bones are pulverized into a powder that loved ones can place in an urn much like they would the ashes from a traditional cremation. Most funeral homes in states where the procedure is already permitted charge anywhere from $150 to $500 more for water cremations than they do for cremation by fire.

Many people are uncomfortable with the idea of dissolving their loved ones. California Catholic Conference Executive Director Ned Dolejsi said that while he wouldn’t consider water cremation to be inherently wrong, it does not treat life and death with respect and dignity.

If this controversial law is passed, it could become an option in California as soon as 2020.

Sources include:

Breitbart.com

KQED.org

NBCLosAngeles.com

The REAL goal of climate change alarmism is to achieve global food scarcity, mass human poverty and depopulation

A lot of scientists have been scratching their heads over some of the claims of climate change activists. After all, the results that we’d get from following their advice and getting rid of carbon dioxide, for example, completely fly in the face of their stated goal of making the earth greener. How is it that they can espouse something that would actually have the opposite of its intended effect? There really is only one explanation that makes sense: A greener Earth isn’t really what they want.

What makes the tropical rainforest so lush and brimming with life? If you answered “the rain,” you’d be correct, but have you ever thought about where rain comes from? It’s a complex process, but it essentially comes from water that has been evaporated from oceans and then distributed by the wind according to the influence of various pressure systems. It doesn’t take an environmental science degree to know that this evaporation is caused by warm temperatures. Therefore, it stands to reason that when the planet is warmer, it’s going to be inevitably wetter, which means more water will evaporate from the oceans and fall onto Earth to help grow food crops and forests.

You might not have ever visited a third-world country, but you’ve surely seen videos and photos from these places. You’ve probably seen countless people crowded onto dusty paths, trekking hundreds of miles to fill rudimentary jars with what little fresh water they can find, treating it as a precious commodity they are willing to fight and die for. A desert is an inhospitable place, yet those who deride global warming would end up with more of it if they got their way. In fact, in the 1970s and 1980s, there was widespread concern about the negative effects of global cooling!

What are they really trying to accomplish?

Everything these climate change activists advocate – getting rid of carbon dioxide, reversing global warming entirely – would actually achieve global food scarcity and lead to mass human poverty. There’s no way that smart and educated people don’t know this is what would happen, so why are they pushing for it anyway? It is starting to look more and more like depopulation is their ultimate goal.

The signs are everywhere, from their insistence that everyone is injected with toxic vaccines to their shameless assertions that cancer-causing GMO foods are the best options out there. They view people as the cause of global warming, which they consider problematic, and in their twisted minds, depopulating the planet is the best solution.

As Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, points out, liberal globalists like Ted Turner and Bill Gates have never been shy about expressing their desire to reduce the population, and this narrative is a key part of their agenda.

Adams explores this topic in a powerful video on Health Ranger Science called Re-Greening the Planet With Global Warming and Carbon Dioxide.

This illuminating video comes on the heels of another Health Ranger science video, Carbon Dioxide: The Miracle Molecule of Life. In this insightful video, Adams makes a convincing case for why the Earth needs more carbon dioxide and not less of it. CO2 is not a pollutant that we need to get rid of entirely as the planet would be nearly devoid of life, and clips of barren cities affected by mass die-offs following the elimination of all carbon dioxide help drive the point home.

One thing is clear: If we let the global warming alarmists get their way, we will he headed down a path toward global food scarcity, mass poverty and depopulation.

Sources:

NaturalNews.com

NaturalNews.com

Weather Channel founder tells CNN “climate change is a hoax” … 31,000 scientists agree

Al Gore’s 2006 documentary, An Inconvenient Truth, and extensive reporting by the mainstream media have led many to accept catastrophic man-made global warming as a scientific fact. But, while this theory is increasingly being taught in schools and other institutions, it is important to note that there are thousands of reputable scientists who absolutely do not agree that global warming is settled science. One of these is John Coleman, founder of The Weather Channel.

In a recent interview with CNN, Coleman stressed that there is no scientific consensus when it comes to global warming. Noting that science isn’t a vote, but needs to be based on cold, hard facts, he stated firmly that climate change simply is not happening.

“There is no significant man-made global warming now, there hasn’t been any in the past, and there’s no reason to expect any in the future,” he stressed. “That’s a whole lot of baloney.”

When asked by the CNN interviewer how he would explain away the fact that 97 percent of scientists with the government, NASA and other institutions all accept global warming as settled science, Coleman claimed that it’s all about the money. Apparently, the government makes $2.5 billion in funding available for climate science each year, but will only fund studies that support the global warming hypothesis. Climate scientists who actually want to work, therefore, have no real choice: If they want to get the money, they have to support the global warming position.

“It’s real simple, but that doesn’t mean it’s right; that doesn’t make it true,” Coleman said. “That only makes it bought and paid for.” [RELATED: Discover the true scientific facts at Enviro.news]

Coleman also made reference to the Global Warming Petition Project, a petition launched in 1998, and signed by 31,487 scientists, including more than 9,000 with Ph.D.’s in atmospheric science, Earth science, climatology and the environment. None of these highly respected scientists accept the theory of global warming.

In fact, these scientists insist, “There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.”

In promoting the petition, the highly respected scientist, Professor Frederick Seitz, former president of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences and winner of the National Medal of Science, noted, “Research data on climate change do not show that human use of hydrocarbons is harmful. To the contrary, there is good evidence that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide is environmentally helpful.”

A study published in the journal Nature Climate Change in 2016, pointed to the beneficial effects of increased carbon dioxide production. That study determined that the Earth has greened “significantly” over the last three and a half decades. In fact, between 25 and 50 percent of our planet’s plant life has been subject to this effect, which is only logical, since carbon dioxide boosts photosynthesis, facilitating increased growth. [RELATED: Carbon dioxide is the miracle molecule for re-greening the planet.]

Back in 2007, two scientists, Dennis Avery and Fred Singer, analyzed the work of over 500 scientists and determined that any current warming of the Earth is likely not caused by greenhouse gases, but is part of the natural cooling and warming process our planet has gone through every 1,500 years for millennia.

Avery and Singer noted that in 2,000 years of recorded history, colder periods like the Dark Ages and Little Ice Age were far more likely to be harmful to people and the environment than the warmer periods. They pointed to historical floods on the Nile, wine production in the U.K. by first century Romans, and ancient paintings with sunnier skies, depicting what is known as the “Medieval Warming,” as evidence of these consistent temperature fluctuations.

So, before accepting all the bought and paid for doomsday global warming “science,” it is well worth looking at all the facts and drawing your own conclusions.

Sources:

ArmstrongEconomics.com

WND.com

PetitionProject.org

DailyMail.co.uk

NaturalNews.com

ScienceDaily.com