Top 6 BOGUS “science-based-medicine” claims founded on faulty research

Science! Scientists, geologists, agriculturalists, climatologists, astronomers, historians, archeologists, biologists, oncologists and geoscientists are so proud to exclaim that their field of study has research and facts to back up their favorite conversations about climate change, GMOs, vaccines, chemotherapy and infectious disease, but what if they all found out today that the majority of their favorite “evidence-based” data was crafted, scripted, manipulated, twisted and distorted to fit an insidious narrative?

Money can buy just about anything except love, and to doubt that money can buy scripted results for faked science research would be unrealistic. Still, the purveyors of fake science declare that anyone who questions their lies, deception and propaganda is “anti-science” and a “conspiracy theorist,” all in a vain effort to discredit real science and honest journalism.

When a powerful biotechnology corporation creates deadly pesticides that kill worms, beetles, bees, plants, farm animals and people, that business needs fake science to back up their empty claims to farmers and consumers about safety, efficacy and “sustainability.”

When rich politicians want to get richer, they invent Ponzi schemes built on fear, propaganda and faked science research to convince Americans (and the rest of the world that’s dumbed down on fluoridated water and flu shots) that it’s all our fault that the earth is about to overheat and flood, and that we’re all going to starve and suffocate to death if we don’t contribute our hard earned money to some bogus cause made up out of “thin air” (pardon the pun).

When the pharmaceutical chemical-medicine-complex of America wants to gain power and riches from the peons who believe chemicals can cure anything, they simply pay big bucks to shill scientists to forge results in laboratories that are then published as “peer reviewed science” and evidence-based facts, even though it’s all paid-for lies and propaganda. Even though every single medicine advertised on television has side effects that are worse than the condition being treated, the crooks at the FDA are protesting to remove those warnings because it’s confusing to Americans, who simply don’t listen and overlook this sidebar information (that’s delivered subliminally anyway).

If you “love” science but don’t trust big corporations and rogue U.S. regulatory agencies, then ask yourself this question: Who ran those “science-based” tests on that medicine, those diseases and disorders, that pesticide and those weather “conditions?” Who ran and paid for those tests? Was it the very companies, corporations and globalists who stand to profit by the millions and billions of dollars from the masses believing in it all?

Lie #1. The Danish Study, based on bogus research, attempted to show that vaccines were not linked to higher autism rates

A criminal psychiatrist named Dr. Poul Thorsen, who was heavily entrenched in pro-vaccine propaganda with the CDC, fled America with over $2 million in embezzled, phony grants he created (using taxpayer dollars) as he scammed well-known U.S. universities and the CDC. Thorsen is the “author” of the Danish Autism Study (complete myth) that attempted to prove vaccines and autism have no correlation. Using fraudulent data to distort the truth about the dangers of mercury in vaccines, Thorsen was the lead investigator of the fraudulent study to cover up the vaccine-autism link that the CDC already discovered (and buried) in 2004.

Lie #2. The $3 billion Human Genome Project ferreted out the genetic roots of most diseases and disorders

When it comes to preventable diseases and disorders in America, medical doctors just love to tell their victims (patients) that everything that’s wrong with them was inherited from their parents’ genes – that way the patient believes there’s no way to cure their problems with a proper diet and that they must take chemical medications for the rest of their shortened lives just to “treat” the symptoms. The Human Genome Project was a complicated boondoggle that is now used for that same purpose. The multi-billion-dollar epic fail project forced the shilling scientific “community” to falsify results and claim they unlocked all the mysteries of the origins of diseases in humans. Why was the project a huge failure? The bottom line was revealed that humans have only about 20,000 protein-coding genes, roughly the same number as the roundworm.

Lie #3. There is no cure for cancer

The cure for cancer lies in filtering chemicals and pathogens out of your body and out of your daily consumption. That means avoiding chemicals and genetically modified organisms in food, water, medicine, home care, yard care and personal care products. Mountains of research prove that an organic, plant-based diet and supplements like vitamin C and D greatly improve your chances of preventing and curing cancer. Fake science fuels the chronic sick care industrial complex of America and the fake “search for the cure.” Look a little harder and smarter and you’ll find the cure already exists!

Lie #4. Zika virus always causes shrunken head syndrome in newborn babies

What happens when you douse a human water supply with a poisonous pesticide, the humans drink it daily for years, and then they have babies? The babies are born deformed. And what happens when globalists (like Bill Gates) want to get richer and depopulate the planet, and they invest in the corrupt vaccine industry? They invent propaganda scare tactics to convince everyone to get more deadly, fertility-destroying vaccines (like Tdap) while spreading more toxic pesticides everywhere. There! You just learned the true story behind the Zika virus scare and fraudulent research. Zika virus is just another “flu,” and it doesn’t cause babies to be born with shrunken heads.

Lie #5. The CDC and their lead scientist Dr. William Thompson, in the early part of this century, studied the safety of mercury in vaccines and found no link to autism.

In the biggest medical discovery cover-up in modern history, the CDC themselves buried the results of a study all but proving that deadly mercury in vaccines causes autism in little boys – mainly African American boys, under age three. An entire team of scientists found out the truth and destroyed the evidence, then altered and skewed the results to fit the corrupt narrative that all vaccines are “safe and effective” – that is, until the lead scientist blew the whistle on the whole thing.

Lie #6. Climate change (global warming) is statistically proven to be caused by human activity and we must give Al Gore our money to fight it

There are some monstrous and insidious ways American racketeers make their fortunes. Those schemes include the pharma-industrial complex, the military industrial complex, and yes, scaring taxpayers into funding Ponzi schemes like global warming. If you are one of those gullible “fish” who bit the bait, it’s time to do a little homework and find out exactly how you got scammed.

Sources for this article include:

NaturalNews.com

TruthWiki.org

NaturalNews.com

TruthWiki.org

NaturalNews.com

HealthImpactNews.com

JimStone.is

NaturalNews.com

Peer-reviewed science journal gets HOAXED by fake science paper that claims PENISES cause climate change

Remember when I said recently that the entire left-wing scientific establishment has become convinced that everything causes climate change? My assertion has now been confirmed beyond any doubt.

A peer-reviewed science journal has just been caught publishing a hilariously fake science paper — written in leftish-sounding “sciency gibberish” — that literally claims penises cause climate change.

Because this junk science assertion fits into the lunatic narrative of the totalitarian Left, it was reviewed by multiple scientists and accepted for publication, even though the entire paper was deliberately written to consist of indecipherable nonsense pretending to sound like elitist left-wing “science.” (Find more news about fake science at FakeScience.news.)

James Delingpole at Breitbart.com covers this hilarious development as follows:

Gender studies is a fake academic industry populated by charlatans, deranged activists and gullible idiots.

Now, a pair of enterprising hoaxers has proved it scientifically by persuading an academic journal to peer-review and publish their paper claiming that the penis is not really a male genital organ but a social construct.

The paper, published by Cogent Social Sciences – “a multidisciplinary open access journal offering high quality peer review across the social sciences” – also claims that penises are responsible for causing climate change.

The two hoaxers are Peter Boghossian, a full-time faculty member in the Philosophy department at Portland State University, and James Lindsay, who has a doctorate in math and a background in physics.

They were hoping to emulate probably the most famous academic hoax in recent years: the Sokal Hoax – named after NYU and UCL physics professor Alan Sokal – who in 1996 persuaded an academic journal called Social Text to accept a paper titled “Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity”.

Sokal’s paper – comprising pages of impressive-sounding but meaningless pseudo-academic jargon – was written in part to demonstrate that humanities journals will publish pretty much anything so long as it sounds like “proper leftist thought;” and partly in order to send up the absurdity of so much post-modernist social science.

So, for this new spoof, Boghossian and Lindsay were careful to throw in lots of signifier phrases to indicate fashionable anti-male bias:

We intended to test the hypothesis that flattery of the academic Left’s moral architecture in general, and of the moral orthodoxy in gender studies in particular, is the overwhelming determiner of publication in an academic journal in the field. That is, we sought to demonstrate that a desire for a certain moral view of the world to be validated could overcome the critical assessment required for legitimate scholarship. Particularly, we suspected that gender studies is crippled academically by an overriding almost-religious belief that maleness is the root of all evil. On the evidence, our suspicion was justified.

They also took care to make it completely incomprehensible.

We didn’t try to make the paper coherent; instead, we stuffed it full of jargon (like “discursive” and “isomorphism”), nonsense (like arguing that hypermasculine men are both inside and outside of certain discourses at the same time), red-flag phrases (like “pre-post-patriarchal society”), lewd references to slang terms for the penis, insulting phrasing regarding men (including referring to some men who choose not to have children as being “unable to coerce a mate”), and allusions to rape (we stated that “manspreading,” a complaint levied against men for sitting with their legs spread wide, is “akin to raping the empty space around him”). After completing the paper, we read it carefully to ensure it didn’t say anything meaningful, and as neither one of us could determine what it is actually about, we deemed it a success.

Some of it was written with the help of the Postmodern Generator – “a website coded in the 1990s by Andrew Bulhak featuring an algorithm, based on NYU physicist Alan Sokal’s method of hoaxing a cultural studies journal called Social Text, that returns a different fake postmodern ‘paper’ every time the page is reloaded.”

… None of it should have survived more than a moment’s scrutiny by serious academics. But it was peer-reviewed by two experts in the field who, after suggesting only a few changes, passed it for publication:

Cogent Social Sciences eventually accepted “The Conceptual Penis as a Social Construct.” The reviewers were amazingly encouraging, giving us very high marks in nearly every category. For example, one reviewer graded our thesis statement “sound” and praised it thusly, “It capturs [sic] the issue of hypermasculinity through a multi-dimensional and nonlinear process” (which we take to mean that it wanders aimlessly through many layers of jargon and nonsense). The other reviewer marked the thesis, along with the entire paper, “outstanding” in every applicable category.

They didn’t accept the paper outright, however. Cogent Social Sciences’ Reviewer #2 offered us a few relatively easy fixes to make our paper “better.” We effortlessly completed them in about two hours, putting in a little more nonsense about “manspreading” (which we alleged to be a cause of climate change) and “dick-measuring contests.”

No claim made in the paper was considered too ludicrous by the peer-reviewers: not even the one claiming that the penis is “the universal performative source of rape, and is the conceptual driver behind much of climate change.”

Read more at Breitbart.com.

The War on Drugs is based on FAKE SCIENCE, warns lab science director who says labs routinely engage in “science crimes” against innocents

The “War on Drugs” is a grand science hoax based on faked laboratory analyses conducted by lab science con artists working for government.

That’s not hyperbole, by the way: It’s a matter-of-fact description of exactly how the drug war is being waged in America, thanks to lab science criminals like Annie Dookhan, who pleaded guilty to systematically faking lab science that convicted over 24,000 people on charges of drug possession. (See the video below.)

Now, over 20,000 of those convictions are about to be thrown out because Dookhan deliberately faked the science.

“About 21,000 drug convictions are set to be thrown out in Massachusetts after a chemist admitted tampering with evidence and falsifying results,” reports Sky News. “It could be the single largest dismissal of criminal convictions in US history.”

Knowingly falsified drug test results to convict innocent people in the interests of government prosecutors

Natural News covered all this five years ago when it was first learned that Dookhan falsified lab science evidence in as many as 34,000 cases. As this Natural News story documented:

Dookhan has admitted she improperly removed evidence from storage, forged the signatures of colleagues and did not conduct proper tests on drugs for “two or three years,” according to a copy of a State Police report obtained by the Boston Globe newspaper recently.

It took five years for the courts to finally order prosecutors to drop the 24,000+ drug convictions, all while innocent people were left to rot behind bars while the “justice system” kept them all imprisoned under false pretenses. As Natural News reported earlier this year:

Recently, the state’s highest court ordered prosecutors to drop a significant portion of the more than 24,000 drug convictions to resolve a scandal – where thousands of people were wrongfully convicted on drug charges in Massachusetts – that has plagued the legal system since 2012.

Annie Dookhan is just one of thousands of lab scientists across America who are faking drug tests every day to falsely convict innocent people

As the lab science director of an internationally accredited laboratory — CWC Labs — I can authoritatively tell you two astonishing things that have become clear to me over the last three years of interacting with the lab science community:

#1) Nearly all the field drug test kits produce false positives for a wide range of substances, from over-the-counter medicines to chocolate bars. A narcotics detective can easily produce a “hit” for almost any suspected substance by coaxing a “positive” from the drug test kits. These kits are scientifically worthless and meaningless, yet the courts continue to treat them as some sort of gold standard proof of evidence of possession. Many of these kits are read by a totally subjective opinion of the color of the resulting liquid, for example. “Color” is completely subjective, and it varies wildly based on ambient light conditions, the mood of the law enforcement officer, and the color pigmentation of the original sample. The human eye gauging a color is not science… it’s total hokum.

#2) Most science labs have no real interest in analytical accuracy. I know this because people in the industry keeps telling me I’m totally obsessed with extreme accuracy, and I’m finding that this dedication is apparently unique to my own lab. To my astonishment, I’ve come to learn that typical drug labs have huge “error budgets” for analytical accuracy, and many of those labs have no idea what their real error rates might be through the entire process of sample prep, analyte extraction, instrument analysis and reporting.

Some labs don’t even know the real LoD or LoQ (Limit of Detection / Quantitation) of the substances they’re looking for (analytes) in the instruments they’re using for testing, and even worse, many labs operate with unclean analytical practices that can result in significant “carryover” which can contaminate one sample with the residues of the previous sample. In other words, there are without question people sitting in prison right now whose only crime was being the next sample in the sequence after a high-concentration sample was run before theirs.

Right now, I could walk into almost any crime lab in America and find huge faults, errors and even fraud in their analytical methods, lack of proper sample handling, lack of technician training, bad statistics, bad reference curves, bad instrument calibration and so on. I’m convinced that nearly every government-promoted crime lab in America is engaged in its own “science crimes” that are designed to deliberately produce false positives in order to continue the tyrannical, idiotic “war on drugs” and keep themselves in business, collecting government money for producing totally junk science.

Annie Dookhan is just the tip of the iceberg on all this. Watch my mini-documentary below to learn the shocking truth about fake lab science pushed by governments all across America. Share this video everywhere… there are innocent people behind bars right now who were convicted by all this fake science.

Eating clean, unprocessed foods is now a dangerous “cult,” declares idiotic mainstream media (with a little help from the dirty diary industry)

As more people are turning their back to dairy and other processed foods, the National Osteoporosis Society, subsidized by the milk industry, has now declared clean eating to be a dangerous “cult” and “ticking time bomb” that could leave young people with weak bones.

For decades, the milk industry has made us believe that milk is crucial for our health. Most of us have been brought up with the idea our teeth and bones will crumble if we don’t drink three big glasses of calcium-rich milk every day.

Though scientific research has linked milk consumption to cancer, diabetes, osteoporosis, multiple sclerosis, heart diseases, allergies, and a host of other diseases, governments and celebrity shills with thick milk mustaches keep telling us that milk is essential to our health. These celebrities, however, forget to tell you that they were paid to make these statements, hiding the dangers lurking behind these hip milk mustaches.

In their latest attempt to push antibiotic- and hormone-rich dairy products onto the people, the mainstream media is spreading fears to spook people into believing healthy dietary choices that reject processed foods are dangerous.

Of all the rumors the fake media, which depends on the advertising money of the dairy industry, has spit into the world, this one breaks all the records. Trying to convince people that eating fresh, whole foods is dangerous is just insane.

Fake media associates poor diet with clean food

People who avoid refined sugar, hormone- and antibiotic-laced milk, and pesticide-laden processed foods have been called “cultists” that jeopardize their health through fashionable diet trends.

“A cult of clean eating is a ‘ticking time bomb’ that could leave young people with weak bones,” the National Osteoporosis Society has warned. “The diets have become increasingly fashionable, and are associated with celebrities, who have boasted how they have cut out gluten, dairy, grains, and refined sugars,” read a recent article published by the Telegraph.

If we believe the National Osteoporosis Society’s survey and the Telegraph’s article — which is nothing more than a propaganda piece for the milk industry — then clean food and people or celebrities promoting this lifestyle are the bad guys, wreaking havoc on your health.

Speaking to the Telegraph, Professor Susan Lanham-New, Clinical Advisor to the National Osteoporosis Society and Professor of Nutrition at the University of Surrey, noted that if there is no urgent action taken to encourage young adults to incorporate all food groups into their diet and avoid clean eating regimes, we are facing a future where broken bones will become the norm.

And it is not just the Telegraph who has been bought by the milk industry to spread this lie. The fake claim has also made the headlines of many other news sources. They all spread the same message, saying dairy products are the best source of calcium and that young people who aren’t consuming substantial amounts of dairy products are putting themselves at risk of developing weak bones and osteoporosis later in life.

They even go as far as to blame social media, blogs, vlogs, and websites such as Natural News for spreading disinformation about dairy and promoting these so-called unhealthy, clean eating diets among the younger generation.

Don’t be fooled by these statements and headlines. Milk isn’t the best source of calcium out there. Many other foods contain as much or even more calcium than milk. Think of foods such as fish, nuts, seeds, leafy greens, and dairy alternatives fortified with calcium.

Don’t let the media fool you, learn more about their fake practices at Faked.news.

Sources include:

Telegraph.co.uk

NaturalNews.com

BBC.com